You are viewing iuztheevil

Iuz

GSL

Wow...

The Game System License (or GSL) for 4th Edition was posted up today and after going through it.... wow. It is really restrictive.

Thinking back on a number of my 3rd Party OGL products, I do not think very many of them could have been published under this license as they currently stand.

Lets take a look..

Liberation of Prince Thorgrim, Compleat Encounter - Nope, includes miniatures. (GSL, Sec 5.5)
Critical Hit Deck - Nope, as it redefines what a critical hit is. (GSL, Sec 4.1) I might be able to get away with the fumble deck.. maybe.
D0: Hollow’s Last Hope, GameMastery Module - Nope, includes page references in the MM. (per the FAQ) and reprints monster elements (GSL, Sec 5.6)
W1: Conquest of the Bloodsworn Vale, GameMastery Module - Nope, same reasons as Hollow's Last Hope. This actually goes for all of my adventures...
Classic Monster's Revisited - Nope, reprints monster stat blocks. Alters core monster stat blocks. (GSL, Sec 5.6)
Pathfinder Chronicles Gazetteer - Hmm, this one I might actually be able to publish. Maybe, except for that the entire Pathfinder line would also have to convert, and almost all of those would be in serious breach. (GSL, Sec 6.1)

And last, but certainly not least...

Pathfinder RPG - Yeah, this one is in breach in just about every way that a product can be in breach. It includes rules for character advancement (GSL, Sec 5.5 (b)), reprints rules elements (GSL, Sec 5.6), and includes open content, which the GSL has no provisions for.

There is some crazy stuff in that contract. It can be killed with basically no notice, and if it is, you must destroy your stock. If you put out a monster (or class, or feat, or whatever), and Wotc later puts their version of that rules element into the game and the SRD, your product is in breach (as far as I can tell). There are no demons or devils (along with a host of other classic D&D monsters) in the SRD (goodbye 4E Vrock.. I'll miss you), nor are their any of the higher level character options (paragon paths, epic destinies).

Now, I am not a lawyer, and this is just my personal read through of the document. That said, it sure seems to me like Wotc wants folks to play in their sandbox, so long as you stay in your corner, do not touch any of their cool toys, and don't make any sandcastles that compete with theirs.

Or maybe that is just me. Man am I glad we stuck with the 3.5 OGL.

Edit: The folks on the paizo board, especially the estemed lemuriapress, brought this up concerning the license.. it is too good for me to pass up.
Tags:

Comments

I'm astonished at the wording of the new license. I've no problem with it being somewhat more restrictive, but some of the restrictions actually *stop* you from making content that Wizards would like you to make.

You know, like adventures. No monster stat blocks from the MM? Madness!

I've liked what I've seen and experienced of 4e, but I really don't like the GSL.
Yeah, it seems to me that any adventure published under this license would be difficult to use and design. You basically cannot even include any rules content unless it is brand new and not rewriting existing content. The fact that you cannot make an adventure that looks like a Wotc adventure (and in fact, looks inferior) means that there is something seriously wrong. There went an industry standard....

Made my night

After reading all of that i didnt expect alot from the video, caught unexpecting, i choked abit on my drink. Thanks for making my night
I'm glad y'all stuck with the 3.5 OGL, too. Paizo has made some of the best products in the industry and I'm happy to keep giving you my money!
And I am happy to keep making products that you can give me money for. :-)
Let me know if you guys have any need for additional writers.

After perusing the GSL, I find myself with little interest in writing for 4E.
Yeah, once things settle down with the Pathfinder rules, things will be opening up quite a bit I would guess.